Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Call for a ban on Bluefin in Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic

  1. #21
    Sit down Shut up And fish Roddy Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, FL
    Posts
    565
    Boat
    20 Caprice
    Home Port
    normally the Burt Reynolds ramp....
    Best Catch
    mmm, Mrs Hays.

    From the BBC this morning.

    By Paul Henley
    BBC News, Barcelona


    "Welcome to the strange world of globalisation."

    That is Roberto Mielgo's response to the fact that it is commercially viable to catch and keep live tuna in off-shore pens - or ranches - in the Spanish Mediterranean and feed them vast amounts of expensive caught fish (around 10kg of feed fish serve to make the tuna put on 1kg of body weight). And to cull them by hand using divers, ship them to shore, package them in a purpose-built factory and fly them whole - on the same day - to market on the other side of the world.

    Roberto Mielgo calls himself an independent fisheries consultant. A former tuna rancher himself, he had a change of heart and became one of the most prominent campaigners for the preservation of bluefin tuna, one of the most highly-prized - and fought over - species and foodstuffs in the world.

    The fact that the United Nations commission set up to preserve endangered species failed, at its conference in Doha this week, to put an international trade ban on this type of tuna, is a bitter disappointment to him. But, he says, it is not necessarily a surprise, given the strength of the global fishing lobby.

    "The Japanese market eats 80% of all the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean bluefin tuna that is produced," Mr Mielgo says. "If you ask me whether to save the stock or to save some jobs, my answer is pretty clear - save the stock. They [the Japanese] are willing to pay the highest price. It is just normal that tuna ranches here in Europe export their very best to the other side of the world. There are people who are trying to manage a sound business with an environmental perspective that do abide by the rules and I have great respect for them. Others do not abide by the rules. It is not a question of criminalising the entire sector, but one has to see the overall problem and that is that tuna ranching is a big part of the problem. It has grown out of proportion," he said.

    "If you ask me whether to save the stock or to save some jobs, my answer is pretty clear - save the stock. The stock belongs to all of us. It's not because two or three companies will have to close that I should not protect a species. We have been playing with fire for the past eight years, we have been overfishing the species to the brink of collapse. It has been a crazy gold-rush."

    Juan Serrano disagrees. As managing director of Balfego, a company that runs Spain's biggest tuna ranch at L'Ametlla de Mar, on the Catalan coast, he has seen profit margins dive. Most tuna caught in the Mediterranean ends up on Japanese plates, and he is, he says, one of the "goodies" of the tuna industry. He vehemently disputes the idea that the bluefin tuna is, in his waters at least, a threatened species.

    "What we are doing is not only entirely legal," Mr Serrano says. "It is sustainable. There is ample scientific evidence from independent sources which confirms our belief that bluefin tuna populations in the western Mediterranean are actually increasing."

    Environmentalists say the average size of the individual tuna caught for Balfego's ranch is going down steadily year on year - a sign, allegedly, of a dangerous plundering of the stock. This, again, is disputed by Mr Serrano. It is not as if the extraction of tuna from the Spanish Mediterranean is a free-for-all.

    The entire national quota of tuna is caught by six boats in the single month per year they are allowed to operate. They deliver their whole catch to ranches along the Spanish coast. The impressive size of the fish Balfego chooses to show me being harvested on the particular day I visited can not be questioned. Specimens of 150kg - longer than a man in length - are culled by divers with a spear-gun, hoisted on board, headed and gutted within minutes and laid in ice to preserve the valuable flesh at its best.

    On shore, the fish are inspected and quality-controlled in order to fetch the maximum price on a market which is supplied on demand and year-round in a way which would not be possible without the live storage facility of a ranch.

    "Within this industry," says Mr Serrano, "there are good and bad operators. No doubt there are some that operate on the wrong side of the rules. What the EU needs to do is punish the bad ones, take away their licenses. But we should not all be tarred with the same brush. Sustainability is vital to us, as is transparency in what we do."

    There is, of course, an irony that, while fishing authorities in Brussels openly declare their support for a moratorium on bluefin fishing in the Mediterranean, their rules continue to allow tuna to be caught by boats which were constructed with the help of public subsidies and processed in factories built, similarly, with EU financial aid. There are, undoubtedly, many in Brussels who will breathe a sigh of relief at the decision of the Doha conference.

    For now, it seems, the fishing lobby has won the day.

    Local authorities with the interests of the fishermen at heart are not, however, celebrating yet. Marti Sans, in charge of the Catalan government's department of fishing in Barcelona, says the outlook for the tuna-catchers is fairly bleak. He stresses that no public money currently subsidises their operations. And he acknowledges that the days of net-catching tuna in the region could be numbered.

    "This is our great worry," he says. "Because we know at the moment that the pressure is very strong. Environmental organisations have made this issue a big priority. At the moment, we are defending a type of fishing that has been been carried out well and rationally. But we have to accept that decisions are taken at higher levels which may force us into a very different situation and ultimately threaten what we do."


    The full version can be seen here : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8577538.stm
    Last edited by Roddy Hays; 03-20-2010 at 07:27 AM.


  2. #22
    Crab mustard is good
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    661
    Some other good coverage here. I've taken the liberty of cutting and pasting the more interesting sections:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereport...nservatio.html

    You might think that in lobbying against a CITES ban, the tuna fishers are proof of the argument that turkeys can indeed vote for Christmas, as they will have nothing to catch if the bluefin population continues to fall; you might think they would have been lobbying for a suspension rather than against it.

    And this is the second point: fisheries economics isn't as simple as that, particularly in the modern era when big vessels can traverse wide tracts of ocean in search of new hauls.

    As a commodity becomes scarcer, the price goes up; investing the extra short-term revenue accrued, at favourable interest rates, can be more profitable than cutting catches to ensure a sustainable fishery.

    Sometimes - this is the real world, after all - fishermen also gain financial compensation from their governments if they have to scrap the ships that brought the resource to its knees in the first place.

    The end of the line is sometimes a profitable place to be.

    The third issue is that in a sense, what countries were arguing about here isn't fish but the universal cake...in fisheries, it's the total catch available.

    It is the tragedy of the commons, with nations as the actors.

    Always, the proponents of restriction argue for scaling down the size of the cake.

    Always, the national interest expresses itself in trying to increase the size of that country's share of the cake.

    The results are entirely predictable.

    In recent years, new countries have entered the annual Mediterranean tuna race - North African countries such as Libya and Tunisia that now have enough capacity to catch a year's worth of bluefin if EU nations pulled out.

    Any nation is allowed to exempt itself from CITES rulings; Japan had indicated it would exempt itself from a tuna trade ban, which meant that if North African nations did the same, the legal trade from the Med to Japan would have continued with no net impact other than on EU fleets which would now be out of the race.

    ....

    The real irony here is that the North African competition only flourished because European companies (with the blessing of member governments, as is necessary) allowed and even encouraged it.

    As the same report concluded:

    "Developed states use foreign investment rules to place excess or additional capacity owned by their nationals or companies under the flag of developing Contracting Parties. In many cases these developing countries have inadequate monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) arrangements..."


    ---------------------------------------

    In this respect, I think sometimes that CITES is probably the only way to stop such demand and supply
    But it won't - not as long as countries can opt out, which Japan won't. Nor will the Mediterranean countries. So I agree with you that they're doomed. They will keep fishing until "producing" bluefin from the Med becomes too expensive to compete against other BFT sources because of the age old argument - if I don't catch them, someone else will (and if politicians try and stop me I'll vote them out).

    The only way to stop such demand and supply is if the public consciousness in Japan turns against consuming BFT. I doubt it will (I can't find anything to back this up but I think the Japanese are well aware of the mercury issue - I've heard Canadian bluefin can't be sold in Canada because their mercury content is too high). But then they did sign up to CITES in the matter of elephant ivory as well, so maybe there's hope. Trade sanctions won't work. Bluefin simply isn't that important to public consciousness in the West that we'll vote in governments prepared to get into a trade war with Japan over fish - let alone use armed force to stop overfishing, because as you so eloquently point out (grandfather's photo in the wallet etc), that's what's going to be needed - I agree with you on that as well.

    I can just imagine a similar discussion happening over Cro-Magnon camp fires when woolly mammoths started getting hard to find.

  3. #23
    #1 Croaker Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    103

    Wink Patudo great post! Extinction looms for (Homo sportfisher personicus)

    Quote"And this is the second point: fisheries economics isn't as simple as that, particularly in the modern era when big vessels can traverse wide tracts of ocean in search of new hauls.

    Sometimes - this is the real world, after all - fishermen also gain financial compensation from their governments if they have to scrap the ships that brought the resource to its knees in the first place.

    "Developed states use foreign investment rules to place excess or additional capacity owned by their nationals or companies under the flag of developing Contracting Parties. In many cases these developing countries have inadequate monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) arrangements..."

    I can just imagine a similar discussion happening over Cro-Magnon camp fires when woolly mammoths started getting hard to find."

    Wow, researched, insightful, and well written!

    This opens up the comparision of modern Pro-Fisherman (Homo sportfisher personicus) with Cro-Magnon (Homo sapiens sans mammothians).

    Pro-Fisherman lived in camps, commercial and recreational isolated by policy, quotas and forums. How will the anthropologist discover them in 100 years? Clutching pieces of trophic web cake?

  4. #24
    #1 Croaker Hunter
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    103

    This site has some heavy duty synthesis from contributors going on

    Journal of Marine Systems
    February 2010, Volume 79, Issues 3-4, Pages 403-417

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.12.018[/url]
    © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


    "How does fishing alter marine populations and ecosystems sensitivity to climate ?"

    http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/20...ation-7384.pdf



    Fish and Fisheries
    June 2009, Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 197 - 216
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00311.x
    © 2009 Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
    The definitive version is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/

    "Lessons from the past: investigating historical data from bluefin tuna Fisheries"

    http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/20...ation-6425.pdf




    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
    United States of America
    April 2008, Volume 105 (14) : Pages 5420-5425
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709034105
    © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    "Complex interplays among population dynamics, environmental forcing, and exploitation in fisheries"

    http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/20...ation-3984.pdf


    Fisheries Research
    OCT 2001; 53(2) : 133-150
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00299-X
    Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

    "Fishing effects and life history traits: a case study comparing tropical versus temperate tunas"

    http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/doc/20...cation-434.pdf

    One could back track and cross correlate more ......but this speaks well for this forum.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Buy GoPro HERO Camera at GoPro.com


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2