The whole spining vs not spining a rod is a big debate. I personally will spine every rod that I build. The whole debate started around the same time that the US got an influx of foreign produced blanks into the market. Coincidence? When the blanks were produced in the states, spining a rod was normal and accepted practice as almost 90% of the blanks were straight. When the blanks were made overseas and then came to the states, they found that they had a large percentage of blanks that were crooked and could not be built, creating wasted money to the companies. At that point, someone had the idea of building on the straight. This utilized the wasted banks that previously couldn't be used, thereby making use of previously unusable product and reducing the losses to the manufacturers. Just because a mass producer does it, does that make it right? Hell no. Actually, if they do it, then I know that I won't do it. If people want a rod that performs like a mass produced POS, then go waste their money on one at BPS or walmart. I won't stoop to that level.
In my mind, this is like mounting tires onto a rim and balancing them and driving away. Would a wheel alignment improve the performance? Yes. Is it one more step that has to be done? Yes, but worth it. The same is for rods. If we as builders are taking the time to put a beautiful buttwrap or inlay on the rod, taking painstaking efforts to address guide placement and taking every effort to make the rod custom to the customer, I feel the least we can do as builders is spine the rod. I would contend that the way to do it os spine it, and if its not going to be straight on the spine, then build it on the straight. A good compromise that might make sense?
Just my 2 cents on this.
Kevin Knox
www.anglersenvy.com