Marty - I don't think I have ever deleted a post in the forum. No reason to start now.
I think the IGFA should maintain records. I also think world records are a good thing and a benefit for our sport. But here is my definition of a true world record. BIGGEST FISH (species) CAUGHT on rod and reel period end of story. All else IMO is bullshit. I don't really care that joe blow caught a 4lb 2oz Giant trevelly on 2lb tippet. That is not a World Record fish - even by IGFA standards. Somewhere in the IGFA rules it states that any fish submitted for a record should be considered above a typical size for that specie.........or something like that.
I also don't subscribe that the IGFA keeps these records for good of the offshore community and the public interest. Here is why. Marty, you are not a member of the IGFA correct? Can you please tell me who holds the record for the 8lb class adult male angler for bluefish. The answer is you can't. Because you are not a member of the IGFA. So in essence the IGFA keeps these records for the sake of its members. Screw you if you are not a member - you can't look it up. BS.
Lets say that you invite one of the kids of the Boys and Girls Club to go fishing and through some good luck that kid catches a 9lb croaker. Holy Matanza batman - that fish must be a record. You need to submit that fish to the IGFA for a record. I bet its a world record. All you need to do is go online and fill out an application and send that application along with a picture of the fish, angler and rod and reel, alng with a line sample and the terminal tackle set up along with a Check for $35...................................whoops - penalty - the kid doesn't have $35 actually $50 since he is not a member. Oh well, nice fish buddy but it is no longer in consideration for a record. Bullshit once agin. The IGFA shouldn't charge anything for records submitted by Jr. and why does it cost more for an non member to submit for a record (that is kept for the good of the fishing community and general public) then it does for a member. Does the IGFA have to do more research for fish caught by non-members?
As far as the circle hook thing. The IGFA merely sent the NMFS a letter consisting of their OPINION as to what a non-offset circle hook is, nothing more. Actually the NMFS didn't even take the recommendation and left the rule so open ended that they didn't even write a definition of a non-offset circle hook. I personally think that circle hooks are great and everybody should use them as much as possible. Should it be a law............nope.
BTW marty, the circle law only applies to HMS permitted vessels. Each country does have its own rules and they have nothing to do with our rules. I can use all the j-hooks I want in venezuela and many other countries.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




