My girlfriend and dad. #'s 682 and 683.
My girlfriend and dad. #'s 682 and 683.
Thanks #706
I was #69...posted on all other web sites it was not posted on![]()
Last edited by hotreels jr; 12-14-2009 at 09:44 PM.
#705 and Forwarded to about 75 others, let's keep the ball rolling
Signed it! Keep it going guys and gals!
Just a suggestion to include city (homeport) and state when you sign as this will add more validity to your signature. If you didnt, you can always sign again as when they compile the data they will discard duplicate sigs without this information.
#1138.![]()
#1169 getrdone!
1254...keep it comin!
Good job, boys! Keep it going!
As for anyone who is holding out thinking this listing would not hurt the fishery, wanted to let you know that the pro-CITES people are currently circulating a letter around congress to get reps/senators to sign on, asking NOAA to delay the current bluefin reg. amendment (the one asking for a couple minor things, including a higher limit for general category boats). They want the rule changes delayed 3 months so that CITES can happen, and then can be dealt with in that light. In other words, they want to get a listing and then use it to affect the domestic bluefin regs, negatively that is. As I have said, this listing is only one part of whats going to come our way, so we have to stop it.