From States News Service ('Facts are Stubborn Things: Implications of HR 3200,' 8/25/09)...
ObamaCare:1. Does Not Require Proof of Citizenship to Obtain Health Services: While Section 246 (page 143) of the bill expressly prohibits illegal aliens from receiving government-run healthcare, the bill does not include a specific requirement that a person prove his or her citizenship in order to obtain affordability credits, which means that illegal aliens could obtain coverage.
Section 152 states that "all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services". This provision has the potential to include illegal immigrants because it may interpret "personal characteristics" to include legal status (Pages 50-51, 143).
2. Requires That If One Family Member Is Covered, All Members Covered: Another provision states that if one member of a family is afforded coverage all members would have coverage, thereby creating another loophole to give taxpayer-subsidized health care to illegal aliens. If a child of illegal aliens is born in the United States, then the entire family becomes eligible for coverage (Page 133).
3. Requires Free Translation Services: Sections 1222 of the bill will provide free translation services and interpreters to those who are not proficient in English. Section 1728 amends SCHIP to provide translation services to children of families and other individuals for whom English is not the primary language (Pages 408-418 and 782).
Meanwhile, 83% of Americans want citizenship verification requirements for any new health care legislation...but not Democrats.
Also, if ObamaCare were not a redistribution scam intended to cover 15 million new potential Democrat voters at everyone else's expense, why would Democrats have even bothered to vote down Rep. Nathan Deal's amendment to prohibit ObamaCare from covering illegal immigrants? If Obama's feigned outrage at this "pure misinformation" were the least bit sincere, Democrats would have had no reason to reject this measure at all, as it would have merely been redundant and changed nothing.
Actions speak louder than words.