
Originally Posted by
Glenn W
Personally, I see both sides of the argument relating to the treatment of prisoners/detainees. However, it seems that ya'll are so interested in protecting/supporting your own political agendas that you refuse to accept the consequences of what side you support.
The fact of the matter is, Western civilization has long admonished the torture of human beings. The history and list goes on and on. Indeed, perhaps the only ones the are truely qualified to speak on this matter are those that have been subject to such practices--- John McCain comes to mind.
In short, American policy for the past 100 years has been clear, and we have laws and rules of engagement as to the limits of enemy and prisoner treatment--- end of story.
On the other hand--- there are going to be instances in which these limits are exceeded by individuals. This doesn't necessarily mean it is right, but it certainly does not mean it should serve as a political platform to publically create national scapegoats or start witch hunts for political reasons. Every administration will have dirty laundry when their tenure is over, no doubt. I think it has been in poor taste, and not in the public interest to air prior dirty laundry publically simply for political gain/purposes.
Some of the prisoner/detainee actions referred to were wrong--- plain and simple, but on the other hand, some of them have undoubtadly been taken out of context and blown out of proportion. In this regard, I agree wholehardely with Dr. Cliff,--- somethings should be dealt with quietly and corrected quietly.---- end of story.