Nope, he's mulatto. But he's referred to ceaselessly the the press and by both parties as black. I can't help but wonder why.
From what I can tell of his heritage, he's precisely 50/50. His mother was about a pure white Iowa (I think) farm girl as they come and his Father, a native Kenyan, about a pure African as they come. So, even the adage that most blacks in America are "calico cats" given the amount on misogeny in America's past doesn't make him black.
Is he culturally black? Some evidence exists for that, I agree. He married an American black woman. He largely resided in and communed with other blacks, not to the exclusion of whites but certainly predominantly. He looks more black than white, that's certain.
But an equal amount of evidence suggests that he's pretty much like a middle class white guy. He's educated. He's well-spoken (OK, that's not necessarily a middle class white guy trait, I'll agree). He's widely supported politically by whites, at least during his successful bid for the Presidency. He's joined an exclusive club as President that was always exclusively white.
So, why the emphasis in the media and elsewhere of his blackness. Is his mulatto-ness too hard for people to understand?
But more importantly, what difference might you feel it makes in terms of policy and governance if someone other than white were the president?
LongFisher



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
It is "Mix It Up" after all. I'll bet you just can't stand the Hot Chick Friday posts either right ?
