
Originally Posted by
longfisher
My son wants to go to MIT to study after high school. Maybe he'll get in, maybe not. It's pretty exclusive, even though he has great grades.
Anyway, he asked me how the beaches were in the NE as he's sort of a water baby. I told him I was not all that familiar with the beaches in Mass. even though I'd visited Harvard and MIT during short sabaticals but that if it was anything like the beaches in NY and NJ he'd be dissappointed.
Why? Because, and correct me if I'm wrong, the beaches are "owned" by the homeowner with the property on which his home sits and the homeowner can restrict access to that beach by erecting various barriers. So, in most places he'd not be allowed access to the beach for fishing, camping or other recreation.
His was really surprised and said that this might enfluence his decision on which school to go to. I don't blame him.
Although there's parks reserved for those who'd like to use the beaches, I hated the freakin' parks to which the average Joe is forced to go. Those parks had parking lots as large as those surrounding a sports stadium.
Every time I went there (was on Long Island and in Teterboro for some years) I had to park at the outermost ring of parking as it was such a crush and had to carry all my beach gear to the beach over that scorching parking lot. Then when I got to the beach it was a crowded as a small island in the southern ocean covered up with elephant seals in breeding season. And, the crowds were every bit as rowdy as elephant seals in rut too.
Miserable experience for someone accustomed to Texas beaches.
You see, here we have what's called the "Open Beaches Act/Law" which guarantees the general public access to the beach for every form of recreation, even camping, from the high water line to the sea. And, if beach erosion begins to nibble away at the beach and if the high tide line then encroaches on a home and it's lot the property will be condemned by the Attorney General's office the the home will either be destroyed or carted off somewhere else.
Furthermore, breakwaters which would surround the home and ward off the encroaching sea are forbidden, although it seems this part of the law is poorly enforced, especially when a Repubican is the Attorney General (Cornyn, now a Senator comes to mind as an AG who did absolutely nothing to enforce this law and who was successfully sued by sportsmen).
When a Democrat is in the Attorney General's office the laws are enforced, no problem. But Republicans are, apparently, afraid to offend rich beach property owners who are, like themselves, mostly Republican. Cheap politicos.
Anyway, our more than 600 miles of beaches, excepting some security zones surrounding some near beach industrial complexes (Homeland Security) and some restrictions on vehicles near the largest towns, are open to all. You can camp, have campfires, transit the beach at will, fish, drive on the beach, launch small boats and other watercraft, even actually live on the beach for as long as 7 days without anyone bothering you, though some towns ask you to purchase a beach permit the revenue of which pays for beach upkeep, cleanup and porta-potties.
How do you guys stand it the way beaches are restricted to only the wealthiest of the wealthy in the NE? Or, am I wrong?
LongFisher