NC's Sue Myrick attempts to get stateside off-shore drilling passed!

[Blue Water Runner]

http://www.house.gov/list/press/nc09...may292008.html


Rep. Myrick Introduces Bill to Drill For American Oil To Help With High Gas Prices



(Washington, D.C.) – Today, U.S. Representative Sue Myrick (NC-9) announced that she has introduced a bill in the US House called the Deep Ocean Energy Resources Act (DOER) of 2008. This bill would end the moratorium on drilling off American coasts and would allow States to drill for oil and natural gas if they so choose. In short, this bill would increase American petroleum and natural gas supplies to help with high gas prices as well as reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

“Some may say my legislation is controversial. So be it. I think it is controversial for our government to do nothing while our economy grinds to halt in large part due to the high price of gas. The American people don’t want more discussions on how to lower gas prices—they want action. That is exactly why I introduced this legislation. Increased American oil production means lower prices and less dependence on OPEC and foreign oil,” said Rep. Myrick. “We know where the oil is. Let’s go get it.”
Gallup released a poll on May 28, 2008, which stated 57% of Americans support drilling for oil off US Coastal areas that are currently off limits. You can see the poll here: http://www.gallup.com/poll/107542/Ma...trols-Gas.aspx

HR 6108, the Deep Ocean Energy Resources Act of 2008 Background Information

· The United States is the only developed nation in the world that forbids energy production on its OCS—Cuba is allowing other countries, like China, to drill for oil close to 50 miles off the coast of Florida, while America sits with its hands tied
· Currently, two moratoriums leave 85% of the OCS off limits to energy production
· The moratoriums prohibit energy development on the OCS in waters from three miles off our coastlines, where State-owned waters end and federal waters begin, to waters beyond 200 miles off the coasts
· A 2006 Department of Interior study of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) estimated reserves of 8.5 billion barrels of oil and 29.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas
· Another 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas are classified as undiscovered resources
· Given the current record-high energy costs, particularly for gasoline and diesel fuel, the United States should be making every effort to increase petroleum and natural gas supplies
· This is particularly important given the geopolitical instability in regions that provide much of America’s energy supply
· In 2006, the House passed HR 4761, the Deep Ocean Energy Resources (DOER) Act with bipartisan support
· This bill gave coastal states the right to determine whether or not they wanted energy production off their coastline and provided equitable sharing of energy receipts
· Given the current record high energy costs – particularly for gasoline and diesel fuel – the United States should be making every effort to increase petroleum and natural gas supplies
· Because of the geopolitical instability in regions that provide much of America’s energy supply, domestic production is vitally important for energy security

DOER Act of 2008

· The DOER Act of 2008 is nearly identical to the bipartisan DOER Act of 2006, which passed in the House in July 2006
· It would give states the ability to determine whether or not they want to restrict energy production up to 100 miles off their shores
· The federal government would be enabled to enter into leases for waters beyond 100 miles
· No leasing would be permitted within 50 miles of the adjacent coastline within an area of the OCS currently subjected moratorium
· The prohibition on leases within 50 miles of a state’s coastline would not expire
· States would, however, have the right to opt out and allow leasing within 50 miles of their coastlines
· Following enactment of the DOER Act, a coastal state would have1 year to prevent natural gas leasing in the area between 50 and 100 miles of the coastline within an area of the OCS currently withdrawn from leasing
· Natural gas leasing off of one state’s coast would be prevented within 25 miles of a neighboring state’s coastline unless the neighboring state allows it
· Oil leasing off of one state’s coast would be prevented within 50 miles of a neighboring state’s coastline unless the neighboring state allows it
· Should a state choose not to act within the 1 year period, the Secretary of the Interior would be given the authority to lease areas for natural gas production (but not oil)
· Coastal states would be given roughly three years to enact restrictions for oil and gas leasing, or just oil leasing, between 50 and 100 miles of the coastline
· Coastal states would be permitted to extend the prohibition against leasing in up to 5 year increments
· Adjacent States would receive royalty shares of 75%, phased-in over time, for areas currently leased within 12 miles of their coastline
· New leases within 12 miles of a state’s coastline would immediately receive a 75% share of revenues
· Revenues of 37.5% from existing OCS leases beyond 12 miles would be shared with the states in a phased-in manner
· New OCS leases beyond 12 miles of a state’s coastline would immediately receive 37.5% of revenues
· Shared funds with states and coastal political subdivisions could be spent for a number of purposes including education, transportation, reducing taxes, environmental restoration, and any other purposes determined by state law
· The DOER Act of 2008 would extend state territorial waters to 12 miles (currently, most state waters are three miles). This is a change from the DOER Act of 2006
· The DOER Act of 2008 would give the Secretary of Defense a waiver allowing leasing east of the Military Mission line, sharing receipts with the State National Guard. This is a change from the DOER Act of 2006
· The DOER Act of 2008 would authorize funds for the Department of the Interior and the States where production occurred, including OCS Adjacent Zones, for monitoring and management of wildlife and fish, and their habitats, and air, water, and other natural resources
· The bill would authorize funds for a Federal Energy and Mineral Resources Professional Development Program
· This program would support existing programs at ABET-accredited petroleum and mining schools, applied geology and geophysics programs, and to individuals for degrees in petroleum and mining engineering, petroleum/mining geology & geophysics and mineral economics
· The DOER Act would also create a National Geo Program, which would authorize funds for a grant program for production of renewable energy from ocean wave, current, and thermal resources
· The National Geo Program would also authorize funds for a grant program for front-end planning for coal-to-liquids, petroleum coke-to-liquids, oil shale, tar sands, heavy oil, and, in Alaska natural gas-to-liquids projects
· Grants for renewable energy production from geothermal and geopressure resources in oil and gas fields would also be authorized by the National Geo Program


Please e-mail your US House members and ask them to support HR6108. You can find your US Congressmen contact information at http://www.house.gov

I e-mailed Brad Miller and simply asked that he support HR6108 before the high energy prices bankrupt the middle class of the USA. I will be interested in his reply. E-mail your congress member if you support this.

[bigeasy]

has some success in her endeavor but don't count on it.

We are in for a devil of a time.

[hotshot1]

I hope she succeeds time to stop depending on the sand people

[trollman]

"We know where the oil is, let's go get it!"

and let's add this:

Let's get it before China comes and gets it!"

[trollman]

> WHO'S TO BLAME FOR HIGH GAS PRICES?
>
> For several decades, the Democratic Party has pursued policies designed to drive up the cost of petroleum, and therefore gas at the pump. Remarkably, the Democrats don't seem to have taken much of a political hit from the current spike in gas prices. Probably that's because most people don't realize how different the two parties' energy policies have been.
>
> Congressman Roy Blunt put together these data to highlight the differences between House Republicans and House Democrats on energy policy:
>
> ANWR Exploration
> Republicans:91% Supported House
> Democrats: 86% Opposed
>
> Coal-to-Liquid
> House Republicans: 97% Supported
> House Democrats: 78% Opposed
>
> Oil Shale Exploration
> House Republicans: 90% Supported
> House Democrats: 86% Opposed
>
> Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration
> House Republicans: 81% Supported
> House Democrats: 83% Opposed
>
> Refinery Increased Capacity
> House Republicans: 97% Supported
> House Democrats: 96% Opposed
>
> SUMMARY
>
> 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of American-made oil and gas.
>
> 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against increasing the production of American-made oil and gas.

[Hatterized]

sounds great...just hope it doesn't fall to the back burner like so many other Bills do in the House

[Bert Rodgers]

You go girl!

To bad the Republican candadate for president is silent on the issue.

Bert

[Bert Rodgers]

> WHO'S TO BLAME FOR HIGH GAS PRICES?
>
> For several decades, the Democratic Party has pursued policies designed to drive up the cost of petroleum, and therefore gas at the pump. Remarkably, the Democrats don't seem to have taken much of a political hit from the current spike in gas prices. Probably that's because most people don't realize how different the two parties' energy policies have been.
>
> Congressman Roy Blunt put together these data to highlight the differences between House Republicans and House Democrats on energy policy:
>
> ANWR Exploration
> Republicans:91% Supported House
> Democrats: 86% Opposed
>
> Coal-to-Liquid
> House Republicans: 97% Supported
> House Democrats: 78% Opposed
>
> Oil Shale Exploration
> House Republicans: 90% Supported
> House Democrats: 86% Opposed
>
> Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration
> House Republicans: 81% Supported
> House Democrats: 83% Opposed
>
> Refinery Increased Capacity
> House Republicans: 97% Supported
> House Democrats: 96% Opposed
>
> SUMMARY
>
> 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of American-made oil and gas.
>
> 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against increasing the production of American-made oil and gas.

That's, at best, 1/2 of the story. The TRUTH is that the Repblicans ,even while supporting it in theory, have done NOTHING to make their case to the American people. After 9/11 they had both house of Congress and the White House. They also had the support of the majority of people. But they failed to even give a 1/2 hearted try. Even today, who is out front beating the drum and making a case for common sense energy? Nobody is doing it loudly. I repeat NOBODY!

Why? Becasue the Republicans are PUSSIES who offer nothing but lipservice to conservatives but almost NEVER deliver.

They have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in monumental proportions over the last 8 years, and now we are going to get European style socialism rammed down our throats.

This conservative can't, for his life, find a reason to call himself a proud Republican.

Bert