
Originally Posted by
longfisher
What's the matter with you, Low-brow. You took two or three days by my count to respond to the rules I proposed. Would that mean that I won? Nope. It meant you were mulling it over or you were consulting the other sources you needed to plaigerize in your comments before agreeing to not consult any sources.
The one thing that I've learned about your working-class hero Conservatives (hahaha, you're not conservative at all. Your just Republican hacks) is that you're fond of someone else doing your thinking for you. How else could anyone except you guys have bought that crap Bush / Cheney peddeled that the Islamists hate us for our freedoms? So, I expect plaigarism is not outside of your limits.
I don't know you very well, Low-brow. But some of the comments made here suggest that the rest of the members of the board don't think too highly of your mental accumen. So, it would not surprise me if you had to do some "homework" to come up with something to say and that you used the time between my suggesting rules to groom your thinking.
Well, did you? I didn't and won't.
Anyway, why don't we allow ourselves a single post each after the first pair to rebut. It doesn't really seem like much of a debate if we merely post position papers, right? I can't stop you from posting after that but I will certainly abide by what we've agreed.
Also, let's set a date and time to post. It'll satisfy the requirement of posting simultaneously without regard to what the other has to say. How about posting at precisely 12:00 noon CDT next Friday?
If either of us doesn't post at that time or within 2 minutes of that time either way then they agree to concede the debate. Agreed?
LongFisher