Often I am refered to as the liberal moonbat of SFC. This is largely due to many members' gross misunderstanding of my philosphy of Government's role in business and sometimes our personal lives.--- so that it is clear--- my philosophy is for government to act as a referee (not equity owner) when things go awry in markets, provide oversight to promote fair competition, and to regulate when market power is present or when competition is not working. Enough about me---
A prime example of why Governement should not be in the business of business is the recent Chrysler bankruptsy and bailout actions of the US Government.
Have you seen the news today that the U.S. Supreme Ct. issued a temporary Stay on the Sale of Assets to Fiat?---- This is a very big deal, and I expect the High Court to rule very soon.
In case you are not aware here is a summary of what's going on--
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Court-...&asset=&ccode=
What all this means is that the U.S. Government ( Obama Administration) as a monetary stakeholder is trying to ramrod the sale of Chrysler's assets to Fiat through will no regard to our laws, proceedures, and fair methods of conducting business. The Supreme Court is saying---- WHOA!!!!, wait just a dog gone minute here Mr. President, we are a Country of laws and proceedures designed to protect all--- not just the interests of the 800 pound gorilla ( in this case the U.S. Government itself). I have no idea of the merits of the Indiana secured bond holders claim, and I haved no position as to what is the right thing to do, but what I do know is that we have specific and defined laws regarding the hierarchy of claims for Chapter 11 bankruptsy and it would appear that secured bondholders are getting the shaft---- and in direct violation of very specific laws protecting secured creditors.----
Why are unsecured creditors being paid handsomely ahead of secured bondholders?-- Why are secured bondholders only getting $0.29 on the dollar? It is pretty obvious-- Uncle Sam needs to consumate the Deal with Fiat regardless of our own laws. It may or may not be fair but the point is, the rules change when the government gets in the business of being in business and has a vested interest in a particular business venture.----
Now, before you all start the "hell yea its all Obama's fault, remember this all started with TARP and Bush. No blaming Bush either as it is Congress that hold's the purse strings to all of this and has an obligation to pull the reins in when things get out of control.---- Actually, a blame game will go nowhere, as it seems to be sign of our times------ spend blindly, and act with haste. It would seem there should be more wise men and women in Washington than one little old lady judge by the name of Ginsburg.![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
. I'm not much at proofing either.
but at least you have the character to engage in spirited debate without resorting to name calling or personal attacks. You stick to quantifiable and/ or qualify-able information that can be researched and verified or disputed.