The judge who threw out the suit brought by the father of Al Alawki, the American citizen who is on a kill list Obama constructed, did so because the father was said to have not standing in the case he was neither the target or an aggrieved person as Al Alawki was not dead yet at the hands of American assassins.
The intent of the case was to challenge whether the Executive Branch of Government could engage in assassinations at will without court oversight. I think all of us, no matter what political persuasion, would prefer our President not take on the the traditional power of monarchs, the power to murder citizens by fiat, right?
Well, that's enough of a sad turn of events. But what the judge said in the rest of his opinion was even more chilling, and I quote from a recent summary of that opinion:
"Judge Bates ruled that "there are circumstances in which the executive's unilateral decision to kill a US citizen overseas is 'constitutionally committed to the political branches' and judicially unreviewable." Regarding the latter "political question" issue, the judge acknowledged "the somewhat unsettling nature of its conclusion". Bates called the case "unique and extraordinary", and said it presented "stark, and perplexing, questions", including "fundamental questions of separation of powers involving the proper role of the courts in our constitutional structure"."
Chilled to the bone. What has Bush - Obama wrought by tyranny?
LF


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
