"FATALLY FLAWED" SCIENCE KILLING AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE OUTDOOR PASTIME
"FATALLY FLAWED" SCIENCE KILLING AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE OUTDOOR PASTIME
by Jim Hutchinson, Jr.
September 18, 2009 - While the U.S. economy struggles, the recreational fishing industry is nearing
collapse. Additional pressure by federal regulators working off data collected by a system deemed
"fatally flawed" in a 2006 report by the National Research Council (NRC) is threatening to shut down a
number of coastal businesses from Maine to Texas, while denying access to the nation's coastal
resources for millions off Americans who enjoy what's been called our nation's number one outdoor
"A primary culprit in our industry's destruction is a statistical survey developed over 20 years ago to track
simple trends in the recreational fishery," said Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational
Fishing Alliance (RFA). "Couple this faulty science with the arbitrary rebuilding deadlines required by our
federal fisheries law and you have a recipe for disaster," Donofrio said. According to Donofrio and the
RFA, "since 1981, fisheries managers have relied on the Marine Recreational Fishing Statisticcal Survey
or MRFSS as a quota monitoring tool on a state-by-state basis, but the fact is that it was never intended
for that function."
MMRFSS was first implemented by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in the late 70's to obtain
general statistics about trends in marine recreational fisheries. Within a few short years, the data derived
from the survey was beeing used to compile annual harvest figures within the recreational sector.
Members of the recreational fishing community point out at that management goals and objectives have
changed in the past 30 yeears, as have the specific requirements for use of recreationnal harvest data.
"Commercial and recreational fishermen are given harvest quotas each year for the amount of fish
allowed to be harvested," explained Donofrio, addding "in theory, commercial fishermen bring their catch
to the dock to be weighed and sold, so once the quota is met the fishery is supposed to be shut down.
However, tracking the number and pounds of fish that our recreationaal community takes is a bit more
As early as 2001, NMFFS was aware of the problems with MRFSS in terms off its accuraacy. In a
presentation before the Mid Atlanticc Fishery Maanagement Council (MAAFMC) in February of 2001, Dr.
David Van Voorhees, PhD with NMFFS, said "monitoring of quotas for small areas or short time periods
and in-season, real-time monitoring of catch quotas to dettermine season closures (are) inapppropriate
uses of MRFSS estimates." Eight years later, the idea oof "overfishing" in the rrecreational sector is
directly tied too these inappropriate estimates.
The MRFSS program uses two main sampling components, a real-time onsite approach where anglers
are intercepted and interviewed at key access points like marinas, bridges annd beaches, while a
secondary component has MRFSS surveyors calling coastal households at random to find active
fishermen. MRFSS random sampling methodology leaves significant gaps in the data reporting, as the
acccess points for the approximate 144 million saltwater anglers in America cannot be covered adequately
by small groups of surveyors, while most survey information relies heavily on individual angler recall and
willingness to volunteer valid information by phone.
Ray Bogan, legal representative of the United Boatmen, a NY/NJ party and charter boat organization
pointed to the initial "waves" of data coming from the MRFSS findings from the months of May and June
of 2009 that indicate that overall angler participation was leading to an overharvest of seasonal quota on
summer flounder, sea bass and scup, despite one of the rainiest springs on record. "There should have
been significant declines in participation because of bad weather," Bogan said in a recent report in the
Asbury Park Press of New Jersey. "Next year will be ugly and short if these numbers are allowed to
stand," he added.
The disconnect between MRFSS numbers and on-water observations is nothing new, as pointed out in a
2008 letter written by the RFA to then Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez. "The recreational fishing
community can identify numerous occasions where MRFSS has produced harvest and participation
estimates that when compared to receipts for fishing expenditures and weather conditions, could simply
not be possible," Donofrio said, while adding "based on a history of producing erroneous estimates that
deviate significantly from industry documentation, the RFA is deeply concerned about MRFSS' inability to
accurately account for abrupt changes in our fishery, such as the current downturn we are experiencing
in the 2008 fishing season."
"In the New York marine district, we've seen a 40 to 60 percent drop in tackle sales, marine space,
usage and overall business," Phil Curcio representing the New York Fishing Tackle Trades Association
(NYFTTA) and New York Marine Trades Association at the MAFMC meetings in August of 2008. "The
participation across the board is way down," Curcio said at that time.
While the captains under Curcio's representation saw business halved in 2008 versus 2007, MRFSS
data from the summer of 2008 showed that New York saltwater fishing participation was only down about
3 percent overall. According to the first four of five waves of statistical data for the season, MRFSS
numbers surmised there were 1.70 million saltwater anglers in New York in 2008 who took 4.39 million
fishing trips, compared to 1.77 million anglers who took 4.53 million trips in 2007.
John Mantione of J & J Tackle in Long Island and a spokesman for the NYFTTA told The Fisherman
Magazine last year that those MRFSS findings were drastically different from what he and fellow
business owners were seeing at the counter, arguing "You can't say that effort is down 3 percent, that's
absolutely wrong." Mantione, like other shop owners, uses overall indicators like bait sales and gear
purchases to establish the most targeted or least targeted species. If big spearing aren't selling, or when
#2 sproat hooks labeled "fluke" on the wall of his shop are still lining the racks at the end of the season,
then participation in that fishery is obviously off. But the cash register is the biggest indicator Mantione
"Our (2008) sales have decreased by 20 to 25 percent," Mantione said, a clear indication he explained of
lower overall fishing participation on Long Island. "Actual people count is proportionate to the dollar
amount, and our numbers, proportionately, are down 20 percent in 2008."
Despite the plea from RFA on behalf of the recreational fishing community to "consider the reality of
reduced recreational fishing participation because of the economy, gas prices and burdensome
regulations when reviewing MRFSS data," the survey findings were once again considered gospel by
regional fisheries managers who met in late 2008 to set the 2009 harvest limits for the recreational
community, a process which will once again take place in the coming months with an eye on fishing limits
According to MRFSS, Maryland's recreational sector went over their 2008 summer flounder quota by
about 32 percent, which in turn necessitated harsher restrictions to the 2009 season. Despite
implementing an increase in size limit, a decrease in bag limits and a shortened season, Maryland
anglers recently learned that they've once again exceeded their quota in 2009, this time going over the
allowable landings by the end of June with MRFSS data waves for July and August still yet to be
"It all comes back to the MRFSS numbers," said Capt. Steve Whitelock of the Happy Hooker in a recent
article by the Maryland Coast Dispatch. "They can't possibly be right. They estimated 73,000 flounder
caught through June with the majority of the summer still to go and the quota in Maryland is 61,000."
Whitelock told the Dispatch that numbers for June should have gone down, considering the increase in
the minimum size for keepers. "The numbers through June can't possibly be right," he said. "They didn't
factor in the increased minimum size limit for keepers. There just weren't that many keepers caught with
that higher size limit."
At the behest of the recreational fishing community, Congress convened a special hearing in 2005 to
look at the data collection methods compiled by MRFSS. The outcome of that hearing was a
Congressional charge that the National Research Council (NRC) conduct an in-depth analysis of the
recreational data collection. In a subsequent NRFS report released by the National Academy of
Sciences in 2006, a panel of experts found that "Both the telephone and access components of the
current approach have serious flaws in design or implementation and use inadequate analysis methods
that need to be addressed immediately." In a presentation to NMFS and the recreational stakeholders,
Pat Sullivan, the Chair of the NRC committee and a Cornell professor, referred to MRFSS specifically as
"Despite the complexity of the challenge and its importance for fishery management, the MRFSS
program staff have been severely handicapped in their efforts to implement, operate and improve the
MRFSS, including implementing the recommendations of earlier reviews," the NRC 2006 study
concluded. "It is not reasonable to expect such a small staff – and one that lacks a Ph.D-level
mathematical statistician – to operate a survey of such complexity," the report concluded.
Following the Congressionally charted study, NMFS began work on a new survey methodology called
the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) which was supposed to be online and operational
by the start of this year. Delays on the federal side pushed back the start date for MRIP, and it's
expected that the new federal program won't be online until sometime in 2010. That means the
recreational fishing community is still stuck with the gospel according to MRFSS, referred to by federal
regulators as the "best available" science.
"The regulatory agencies that control our fisheries have not been willing so far to accept any scientific
research that prove theirs incorrect," said Pam Anderson, the Operations Manager at Capt. Anderson
Marina in Panama City Beach, FL. "They conveniently call data that's not their own 'not the best
available' data," Anderson said, adding that the Panama City Boatmen Association (PCBA) has been
working with these agencies for 20 years now and the news only seems to get worse. "We have been
very clear that we want to protect our natural resource and have the privilege to stay in business at the
same time," Anderson added.
While MRIP is still in the design and development stage, the recreational fishing industry is left to adhere
to the best available science, leaving their own on-water observations and industry data to be considered
at best "anecdotal" in nature. According to the NRC report, those types of experiential, narrative or local
information should be used during the scientific process. "When no other information is available,
anecdotal information may constitute the best information available," the NRC reported in its executive
summary, adding "In addition, anecdotal information may be used to help validate other sources of
information and identify topics for research."
Members of the recreational industry wonder aloud why theirs seems to be the only industry in America
where stakeholder analysis isn't allowed to be used for statistical reporting. "Look at sales tax revenues,
look at regional reports, talk to the manufacturers, come to a show like Hal Brown (tackle trade show),"
said NYFTTA's Mantione. "This isn't anecdotal; these are solid, hard numbers."
In-person field sampling and telephone interviews are expected to continue with the new survey
program, but many specific survey elements related to both data collection and analysis are being
refined for the future. A significant feature of MRIP will be the creation of a national saltwater angler
registry, which is said will help improve data collection. Rather using coastal phonebooks, a national
saltwater registry of recreational anglers will theoretically streamline the procedure for surveyors to
contact actual anglers. While the process may be changed, the content of the actual questions is still
open to debate. If current experiences are any guide, it's hard for the for-hire industry to be overly
Capt. Brook Koeneke runs a 45 pontoon boat along the quiet, back bay waters of southern New Jersey,
catering primarily to the summer visitors who enjoy a more pastoral summer flounder fishery along the
Jersey Shore. Koeneke says the tightened restrictions over the past few seasons on a healthy stock of
fish have left his customers with fewer fish to take home. "In 2006, a good day for us out of two daily
trips, when conditions were okay, was anywhere from eight to 12 keepers per trip. Anymore, a good trip
is two keepers, and that's about it. Being a back bay operation, I can't go out in the ocean chasing the
big keeper fish."
Like other registered fishing captains, Capt. Koeneke occasionally gets phone calls from federal
surveyors asking about for-hire participation, but he says the questions are obviously not producing the
right answers. "They want to know where I leave from, where I return to, how many people are fishing
and how many hours of fishing do the people get when they do fish," Koeneke said, adding "I ask them,
'don't you want to know what I caught,' and they say 'no'."
Koeneke, like most professional captains whose business has suffered in recent years, is not one to
mince words when it comes to the current state of the industry and the response from regulators and
legislators alike. "The government doesn't want to know what I catch and I think this is dead wrong.
They could care less about what I catch," he said. "Why the hell can't they ask me and all the other back
bay guys what we catch? Because they're not doing the job, that's why."
"Angry about it? Damn right I am, I'm madder than hell," Koeneke said.
Fellow New Jersey charter captain Adam Nowalsky said it's time to take a closer look at the original
MRFSS data to better correlate the data between date and locations. Doing so he says will prove that
some of MRFSS trends have failed to take into account the loss of participation during times of bad
weather. "We need to get the raw intercepts and find out when and where people were going dockside"
to interview fishermen Nowalsky said. At a New Jersey Marine Fisheries Council meeting, Nowalsky
appealed for help from the state's Division of Fish and Wildlife, but that agency's marine fisheries
administrator said that his office would not help. "We have no staff," said Tom McCloy, explaining "We're
completely 100 percent overboard" already trying to meet legal obligations. McCloy said the recreational
industry should mount a challenge itself using the federal Freedom of Information Act.
The New Jersey captains are not unique in their frustration, though according to some of their
neighboring states, the Garden State anglers should have a rosier outlook than they do. Bad MRFSS
data going back to 2003 has forced New York anglers into a terrible position in recent years, with a
summer flounder season and bag limit that's a fraction of what they have in New Jersey, with a trophystatus
size limit of 21 inches. "We know folks who tried all summer long to catch a keeper fluke in New
York, with no success," said Donofrio. "It all goes back to a MRFSS anomaly from 2003 when
recreational anglers allegedly overharvested during one of the wettest and windiest springs on record
according to NOAA's own weather observations."
According to Donofrio, every year that NMFS comes back with an overage in one season, fisheries
managers must cut back that much more in the season to follow. "That's like missing a credit card
payment, where every time the bill arrives, you're stuck trying to pay back the interest alone. With
MRFSS' help, we're never going to get a chance to work on the principle."
Captain Mike Barnett, who runs a six-passenger downeast style charter boat called the Codfather along
the South Shore of Long Island, said NMFS already has a method for statistical data collection, but it's
just not being utilized properly. As a federal fisheries permit holder, Capt. Barnett said he's required by
law to submit vessel trip reports (VTR) to both the state and federal fisheries service, but wonders where
that data actually gets used. "I am required by NMFS in conjunction with New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation to submit a VTR for each recreational trip I take," Barnett said, adding "this
particular report is kept but not utilized by NMFS." Like Capt. Koeneke, Capt. Barnett can't help but
wonder about the effectiveness of the survey questions in the first place.
Continued cutbacks based on fatally flawed data is leading some groups towards what they believe is
their only recourse – legal action. In Florida, recreational anglers are suing NMFS based on the federal
agency's inability to meet the NRC requirement to "fix the broken problem" with regard to MRFSS. The
suit contends that Florida anglers are being denied access to both the snapper and grouper fisheries due
to questionable scientific assessment and a faulty survey system. Similarly, New York State Attorney
General Andrew Cuomo has taken the Department of Commerce to court on behalf of recreational
anglers in that state. "By relying on indisputably obsolete science, the federal government and the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission are subjecting New York to limits that not only discriminate
against New York anglers, but fail to properly protect the fishery," Cuomo said.
Maureen Wren of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) recently told the
Long Island Press "NMFS establishes harvest limitations based on historical knowledge of how many
fish recreational fishermen catch, which we feel are inaccurate." In that same interview, NMFS employee
Teri Frady admitted, "We don't have the most efficient data to collect information on anglers, and the
fluke fishery is one of the most peer reviewed, highly scrutinized and complex fisheries in the nation due
to the recreational component."
While NMFS officials continually point out that their scientific process is "peer reviewed" by independent
scientific researchers, the federal fisheries staff can't discount the actual inaccuracies coming out of their
scientific reporting, particularly true with summer flounder stock assessments. "Peer review isn't
corroboration of the data, it's an actual review of the process itself," said DePersenaire, adding "The
methodology itself might be way off the mark, but it could still pass the peer review because researchers
followed the actual process for employing a certain model.
According to the RFA, that's tantamount to saying that the means justifies the ends. "Imagine if a
hospital uses a procedure that leads to infection in 35% percent of the patients, but an independent peer
review shows that the procedure was actually administered correctly," Donofrio surmised. "We're trying
to offer a safer, more successful treatment option, but our experts have continually been kept out of the
operating room." In 2008, the recreational industry was finally able to crack through the theoretical wall
of science by raising money for new scientific analysis through the industry-supported Save the Summer
Flounder Fishery Fund. With the help of internationally recognized fisheries biologist Mark Maunder,
Ph.D, the previously "peer reviewed" stock estimates for summer flounder were adjusted by
approximately 60 million fish, proving overnight that the summer flounder stock was not overfished and
that overfishing was not occurring.
Industry advocates are hoping that Mid Atlantic example can help lead to bigger advances in the South
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico where both snapper and grouper restrictions are devastating the recreational
fishing industry there.
"If government is allowed to arbitrarily use information that is not accurate (to set rules), there's
something wrong with that," said South Carolina charter boat captain Mark Brown recently in the
Charlestown Post & Courier. Brown, like other captains in attendance for the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council hearings in South Carolina in September said he doesn't trust the research. Much
of that flawed MRFSS data is actually used to determine the overall stock assessment of fisheries like
red snapper, which is especially troubling to researchers like DePersenaire. "The most profound
problem is not MRFSS itself but how the managers are currently using it," said DePersenaire. "You have
heard Dr. Van Voorhees say numerous times just as I have, that MRFSS is not intended to be used on
fine geographic or temporal scale, yet, year after year NMFS and fisheries managers disregard the
known limitations of MRFSS and use it inappropriately, often to the harm of the recreational fishing
DePersenaire doesn't believe there's any hope that MRFSS can be sufficiently improved upon in order to
satisfy the federal management demands, not unless the scientific method is broadened to include
corroborating information from other sources, including industry data and onwater observations.
"Perhaps in the future, some regression can be made between fuel sales, tackle sales, bait sales, and
fish harvested or effort," DePersenaire said, adding that the inclusion of such 'metadata' in fisheries
statistical analysis could help scientists substantiate or 'ground truth' the data. "If metadata groundtruthing
was permitted, the 10 year MRFSS trend would probably be lower and New York may not be in
the inescapable downward spiral that began in 2003."
While NMFS continues to redesign a more workable solution to a "fatally flawed" statistical survey,
members of the recreational fishing industry continue to take stock of their own future. "Recreational
fishing is one of the most enjoyable American pastimes, and these East Coast and Gulf retailers we
distribute products to provide equipment, information, and support to many fishermen and women along
with their families while on vacation or throughout the year," said Gary Zurn, Senior Vice President of
Marketing at Big Rock Sports, an international tackle distributor.
As newly appointed Chairman of the Government Affairs Saltwater Committee at the American
Sportfishing Association, Zurn supports the RFA's efforts to address the stifling scientific anomalies in
the marine recreational fishery, adding "Further restricting fishing access to recreational anglers due to
inaccurate science will deprive these anglers of a sport they love and our retail dealers from making a
living in a business they are passionate about."
Recreational Fishing Alliance / www.joinrfa.org
Crab mustard is good
can i have an executive summary on that report?
I support advertisers
My best friend has a 65 footer
Thanks Jer for the info. Ive been fighting the s.a.c on 17a 17b and I hope others will join the fight.
I support advertisers
All I know is that I had a horrible year for flounder in the back bays. I talked to other friends who fish the commercial pontoon boats in the Ocean City area. they said 1 or 2 keepers on a full boat was the norm for the trips they were on.In fact on some trips there wasn't even a pool fish caught.
I used to take boat pictures while I was out fishing. The number of boats fishing in the bays behind Ocean city was smaller this year than last year even though fuel prices were lower. I really can't figure out where the numbers come from.
I think Admin is going to let me have this space
I use a green machine
When the facts are laid out, you can see that logic is not the driving factor in fisheries management.
Regrettable. Without a strong lobby, logic goes nowhere.
I'm still amazed at how many people spend hundreds, thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions on fishing and boating and don't join the RFA.
For less than the cost of a tank of gas, you can support an organization fighting for a fair say.
I support advertisers
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO