CIA Director???

[bigeasy]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123378062602049003.html

Check out this link. Looks like another well connected Washington insider on the lecture circuit.

Another insider consultant. Reminds me of Daschle. I suspect his mission will be to further emasculate our intelligence capability.

[GALAZIO]

BigE...

All one needs to do is study the history of this cat...

Anyone from Long Beach CA here???? Maybe they can recall Clinton and his cronies (before Clinton's Impeachment) funneling chinese firearms illegally into the US by using one of his closed down naval yards... leasing it to a COMMUNIST CHINESE shipping company, COSCO... and dumping thousands of illegal firearms on the steet in LA (along with the drugs he was flying into Mena AR and having distributed in LA by none other than Freeway Ricky Ross)...

So... who was the lead negotiator speaking on the BEHALF OF THE CHINESE??? None other than Leon Panetta (Clinton's own Chief of Staff negotiating with the staff... anyone else think this is a bit odd???)

Who's mission was it to dump these firearms in the streets??? None other than Leon Panetta.

If ya don't believe it... try looking up the name, Wang Jun... one of the world's leading "arms dealer" and see what comes up when you add Clinton's name to the search... I bet Panetta appears somewhere.

[Glenn W]

Not withstanding Galazio's typical conspiracy theories, we shall see what falls out. Does Congress need to confirm the CIA director?--- I don't know.

[bigeasy]

Not withstanding Galazio's typical conspiracy theories, we shall see what falls out. Does Congress need to confirm the CIA director?--- I don't know.

He must be confirmed and in all likelihood he will be. A lot of these high level people come with serious baggage but all to date been confirmed.

Are these the best and brightest that America can provide? Lord help us.

Louis Freeh would have been a better choice. He was Clintons' FBI guy. As I recall Clinton hated him. He tried to enforce the law.

[GALAZIO]

Not withstanding Galazio's typical conspiracy theories, we shall see what falls out. Does Congress need to confirm the CIA director?--- I don't know.

Hey Buddy!

Prove ANY of the statements in my post false... ANY ONE OF THEM...

[Glenn W]

Hey Buddy!

Prove ANY of the statements in my post false... ANY ONE OF THEM...

You may be dead balls on correct I don't know--- Given some of your other conspiracy theories, let's just say I view your allegations with a jaundice eye. We'll see what falls out. Perhaps you can share some credible references as to your allegations as I'm frankly not all that interested in doing my own reseach and have no compelling desire to prove you right or wrong.

[knot for shore]

You may be dead balls on correct I don't know--- Given some of your other conspiracy theories, let's just say I view your allegations with a jaundice eye. We'll see what falls out. Perhaps you can share some credible references as to your allegations as I'm frankly not all that interested in doing my own reseach and have no compelling desire to prove you right or wrong.

Then why post at all? Just ball busting? I don't know..

[GALAZIO]

You may be dead balls on correct I don't know--- Given some of your other conspiracy theories, let's just say I view your allegations with a jaundice eye. We'll see what falls out. Perhaps you can share some credible references as to your allegations as I'm frankly not all that interested in doing my own reseach and have no compelling desire to prove you right or wrong.

I wouldn't expect anything lees, or more from you Glenn... Start here: Read and learn all you can about the COX REPORT (it was a little Top Secret investagation into Clinton and his boyz you might find interesting... from there, you will be offered many paths to follow).

Enjoy.

[GALAZIO]

Well?????

Did ANYONE make the effort & take the time to look into "my conspiracy theory"???

... If looking it up is too much effort, here, I'll help ya:

http://www.house.gov/coxreport/

EDIT: Be sure to pay close attention to what they don't want you to know as spelled out on page 1:
A NOTE ON REDACTION
The Final Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the Peoples’ Republic of China was unanimously approved by the five Republicans and four Democrats who served on the Select Committee.

This three-volume Report is a declassified, redacted version of the Final Report. The Final Report was classified Top Secret when issued on January 3, 1999, and remains so today. Certain source materials included in the Final Report were submitted to the Executive branch during the period August-December 1998 for declassification review in order to facilitate the production of a declassified report. The Select Committee sought declassification review of the entire report on January 3, 1999. The House of Representatives extended the life of the Select Committee for 90 days for the purpose of continuing to work with the Executive branch to declassify the Final Report. A series of further extensions was voted by the House of Representatives until the final declassification review was completed in May 1999. Following an extended series of negotiations between the House of Representatives and the Executive branch, a number of material deletions have been made to the Final Report.

As a result of these deletions, a number of significant events, facts, and analyses have been omitted from this declassified Report. In several cases, important factual examples substantiating conclusions in the report have been deleted. In other cases, explicit findings of the Select Committee have been suppressed. The Select Committee’s classified Final Report, therefore, remains the definitive product of its investigation and analysis.

[jbrob]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123378062602049003.html

Check out this link. Looks like another well connected Washington insider on the lecture circuit.

Another insider consultant. Reminds me of Daschle. I suspect his mission will be to further emasculate our intelligence capability.

I sure he will give us the same sort of "slam dunk" George Tenet gave us.